Clinical significance of extracellular vesicles in plasma from pancreatic cancer patients
Editorial Commentary

Clinical significance of extracellular vesicles in plasma from pancreatic cancer patients

Maria Gazouli1, Konstantinos Papiris2

1Laboratory of Biology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;2Endoscopic Surgery Department, Hippokration General Hospital, Athens, Greece

Correspondence to: Maria Gazouli, Associate Professor of Molecular Biology. Laboratory of Biology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece. Email: mgazouli@med.uoa.gr.

Comment on: Yu S, Li Y, Liao Z, et al. Plasma extracellular vesicle long RNA profiling identifies a diagnostic signature for the detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut 2020;69:540-50.


Received: 07 March 2020; Accepted: 27 March 2020; Published: 30 December 2020.

doi: 10.21037/dmr.2020.03.02


Despite intensive research over more than a decade, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cancer (PDAC) remains an increasing source of cancer related death. The survival rates are still poor with no significant improvement in the last decades (1). Its high mortality rate is mainly due to complex pancreatic cancer biology and difficulty in early-stage diagnosis. Thus, tools for fast and accurate diagnosis of PDAC are necessary for improving outcomes.

Currently, the tumor-derived extracellular vehicles (EVs) seems to be an attractive approach to monitor cancers using plasma samples. Recent data support that EVs are more abundant than other circulating biomarkers, more stable regarding their structure, and contain protein, nucleic acids, mRNA profiles that significantly reflect those of parental cancer cells (2).

Yu et al. (2020) provides the first genome-wide analysis of EV long RNAs (exLRs) in plasma from PDAC patients. The authors suggested that is feasible to identify cancer biomarkers using the exLR profile. Furthermore, Yu et al. developed an exLR-based diagnostic signature that showed great precision for the PDAC diagnosis (3). More specifically the authors studied 501 participants, PDAC (n=284), chronic pancreatitis patients (n=100) and healthy controls (n=117), before surgery regarding the patients with resectable tumors and before chemotherapy regarding the patients with unresectable tumors. However, 5 patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Yu et al. established a diagnostic signature that comprised eight exLRs (FGA, KRT19, HIST1H2BK, ITIH2, MARCH2, CLDN1, MAL2 and TIMP1) for PDAC detection (3). Even though long RNAs have an effect on various cancers, their biological function and molecular mechanisms in carcinogenesis remain largely unknown. Long RNAs are well-known as epigenetic regulators that have a role in various cellular processes such as cell proliferation, development, differentiation, apoptosis and therefore oncogenesis (4). As they are highly specific and easily detectable in tissue, serum, plasma, and urine, interest in studying long RNAs in cancers continues to increase (5). Currently several studies have found higher levels of H19, HOTAIR, HOTTIP and MALAT-1 in pancreatic cancer cases. Additionally, PVT1, HULC, AF339813, LOC389641 and AFAP1-AS1 also has been reported to be upregulated in PDAC, however the exact mechanism of action of these long RNAs in PDAC remains to be clarified (6). Even though long RNAs have been shown to be implicated in PDAC pathogenesis, and seems to be promising biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis, their usefulness as clinical biomarkers has not been evaluated yet. Interestingly, none of those previously mentioned long RNAs have been found in EVs tested by Yu et al. (3).

To develop a new, noninvasive diagnostic approaches, recent research has focused on EVs. It is well known that tumors-derived EVs have a dual role in that they have antitumor activity and also promote tumor growth. Specific long RNAs contained in tumor-derived EVs can be the quantifiable, and noninvasive biomarkers (7). EV-associated RNAs, such as microRNAs (miRNAs), mRNAs, long RNAs, and other small RNAs, can be transferred between cells and endorse their roles in recipient cells (8). Regardless the various studies of exosomal long coding RNAs functioning as cancer diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers, a number of these studies did not define the sensitivity and specificity of the long RNAs when applied to patients, or sensitivity and specificity to a specific tumor. It will be interesting if Yu et al. (3) investigate if the proposed diagnostic exLRs signature is specific to PDAC, since the long RNAs reported are implicated also in other cancer types i.e., breast cancer, colorectal cancer, etc. (9,10). Additionally, the majority of the existing studies cannot indicate the direct relationships of the tested exosomal long RNAs and cancers (11). Another issue is the methodological differences in EV isolation make this approach inadequate in achieving reproducibility between the different studies.

Recent studies have also shown that exosomes released by gemcitabine-treated cancer-related fibroblasts increased the proliferation and survival of pancreatic cancer cell lines (12). Thus it would be interesting if Yu et al. (3) reported if the five patients received gemcitabine based neoadjuvant chemotherapy exhibit different exLRs diagnostic signature.

Undoubtedly, the research on EVs as cancer diagnostic/prognostic biomarkers is increasing even if there are many issues to be solved. Studies such as this of Yu et al. (3) are very important since they confer to better understanding of the nature and function of exosomes, and give insights for the improvement of diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Future studies will likely put more efforts into in vivo models and clinical application in order to help clarify the function and importance of exosomes, and it’s contain on carcinogenesis.


Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the DMR editors for this opportunity of writing this editorial.

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This is an invited article commissioned by the Editorial Office, Digestive Medicine Research.

Conflicts of Interest: Both authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/dmr.2020.03.02). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Zhang L, Sanagapalli S, Stoita A. Challenges in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2018;24:2047-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Théry C. Cancer: Diagnosis by extracellular vesicles. Nature 2015;523:161-2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Yu S, Li Y, Liao Z, et al. Plasma extracellular vesicle long RNA profiling identifies a diagnostic signature for the detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gut 2020;69:540-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Moschovis D, Gazouli M, Tzouvala M, et al. Long non-coding RNA in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Gastroenterol 2017;30:622-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Wang J, Zhang X, Ji C, et al. Novel Implications of Exosomes and lncRNAs in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer. In: Jin Wang. editor. Novel Implications of Exosomes in Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer and Infectious Diseases. Chapter 1. InTech, pp.3-33.
  6. Previdi MC, Carotenuto P, Zito D, et al. Noncoding RNAs as novel biomarkers in pancreatic cancer: what do we know? Future Oncol 2017;13:443-53. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Revenfeld AL, Bæk R, Nielsen MH, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic potential of extracellular vesicles in peripheral blood. Clin Ther 2014;36:830-46. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Kosaka N, Kogure A, Yamamoto T, et al. Exploiting the message from cancer: the diagnostic value of extracellular vesicles for clinical applications. Exp Mol Med 2019;51:1-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Saha SK, Yin Y, Chae HS, et al. Opposing Regulation of Cancer Properties via KRT19-Mediated Differential Modulation of Wnt/β-Catenin/Notch Signaling in Breast and Colon Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11:99. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Han J, Lim W, You D, et al. Chemoresistance in the Human Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cell Line MDA-MB-231 Induced by Doxorubicin Gradient Is Associated with Epigenetic Alterations in Histone Deacetylase. J Oncol 2019;2019:1345026. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Zhao W, Liu Y, Zhang C, et al. Multiple Roles of Exosomal Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancers. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:1460572. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Lan B, Zeng S, Grützmann R, Pilarsky C. The Role of Exosomes in Pancreatic Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:4332. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/dmr.2020.03.02
Cite this article as: Gazouli M, Papiris K. Clinical significance of extracellular vesicles in plasma from pancreatic cancer patients. Dig Med Res 2020;3:114.